Chenthamarakshan v. Arjun Pandian, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt court closed the contempt case filed by petitioners against orders in WP(C) 9525/2021. The court accepted that directions were prima facie complied with based on submitted documents but preserved liberty for a rehearing if non-compliance is found.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 3RD MAGHA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 17 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 9525/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN W.P.(C):
1 CHENTHAMARAKSHAN, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.VELAN, PALAKODE HOUSE, BANGLAMEDU, NENMENI.P.O. , PIN - 678506
- 2 P.T.JOSE, S/O.LATE P.L.THOMAS, PUNNELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THAZHAKATTU.P.O., KAMBODINJAMKKAL, THRISSUR - 680697
- 3 THOMAS JOHN, S/O.P.T.JOHNSON, PUNNELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ALOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR - 680733
- 4 PIOUS THOMAS, S/O.P.T.THOMAS, PUNNELIPARAMBU, ALOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR - 680733
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
CHENTHAMARAKSHAN AND OTHERS
- respondent
ARJUN PANDIAN
- respondent
MRUNMAI JOSHI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court