Lbs Road Residents Assciation v. a.S.Naizam
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case, the High Court noted the Amicus Curiae's report that while some works were done, a culvert owned by PWD required reconstruction. The court closed the contempt proceeding, reserving liberty for the petitioners to invoke appropriate remedies for the uncompleted works.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; liberty reserved for petitioners to invoke appropriate remedies regarding uncompleted culvert reconstruction.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1656 OF 2021
(IN THE MATTER OF ORDER DATED 27.07.2020 IN WP(C)NO.35803/2019)
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
1LBS ROAD RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION,
REGISTRATION NO. ER/286/2012,
PONEKKARA, EDAPPALLY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
PRADEEP KUMAR P.R, S/O RAJAPPAN NAIR,
RESIDING AT GANGOTHRI, LBSRRA NO. 121,
UNIVERSAL ROAD, CHUTTUPADUKARA, AIMS,
PONEKKARA P.O, KOCHI-682 041.
2VARGHESE JOSEPH V., S/O V.P. JOSEPH,
TREASURER, LBS ROAD RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION,
RESIDING AT LBSRRA NO 121, UNIVERSAL ROAD,
CHUTTUPADUKARA, AIMS, PONEKKARA P.O,
KOCHI-682 041.
BY ADV V.BIJU JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS NO.3 & 4 IN WP(C):
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the issues regarding non-compliance of earlier directions were resolved or left for separate remedy.
Whether the work status was verified by the Amicus Curiae.
Whether the petitioners have an alternative remedy for uncompleted work.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
LBS ROAD RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY PRADEEP KUMAR P.R
- petitioner
VARGHESE JOSEPH
- respondent
A.S.NAIZAM
- respondent
SMITHA P.J
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court