In a contempt case (Con. Case(C) No. 155 of 2023), the Kerala High Court was informed by the petitioners' counsel that court-directed compliance had been met and no further grievance existed. The court accepted this submission and closed the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT
THEHONOURABLEMR.JUSTICERAJAVIJAYARAGHAVANV
FRIDAY,THE7THDAYOFJULY2023/16THASHADHA,1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 155 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5716/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
1VIPINMATHEW,
AGED36YEARS
S/O.MATHEWABRAHAM,PARAKAVILHOUSE,
KANAKAPPALAMPO,ERUMELI
(PEON/OFFICEATTENDANT,NOELMEMORIALHIGH
SCHOOL,KARIAMPLAVE),PIN-686509
2BABURAJC.S.,
AGED34YEARS
S/O.SASIKUMARC.K.,
VELLIKKARACHARUVIL,KUMBANADPO,THIRUVALLA
(PEON/OFFICEATTENDANT,NOELMEMORIALHIGH
SCHOOL,KARIAMPLAVE),PIN-689547
BYADVS.SUBHASHCHAND
RESPONDENT/S:
1A.P.M.MOHAMMEDHANISH,
AGEDABOUT50YEARS,
THESECRETARYTOGOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENTOFGENERALEDUCATION,
GOVERNMENTSECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-,PIN-695001
2JEEVANBABUK.,
AGED50YEARS
AGEDABOUT50YEARS,
THEDIRECTOROFGENERALEDUCATION
(FORMERLYTHEDIRECTOROFPUBLICINSTRUCTIONS),
OFFICEOFTHEDIRECTOROFGENERALEDUCATION,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-.,PIN-695014
CON.CASE(C)NO.155OF2023
2
3RENUKABAI,
AGEDABOUT55YEARS,
THEDEPUTYDIRECTOR(EDUCATION),
OFFICEOFTHEDEPUTYDIRECTOR(EDUCATION),
PATHANAMTHITTAATTHIRUVALLA-.,PIN-689101
4P.R.PRASEENA,
AGEDABOUT55YEARS,
THEDISTRICTEDUCATIONALOFFICER,
OFFICEOFTHEDISTRICTEDUCATIONALOFFICER,
THIRUVALLA-,PIN-689101
BYADVSPL.GOVT.PLEADER
SMT.NEEMATV,SR.PP
THISCONTEMPTOFCOURTCASE(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFOR
ADMISSIONON07.07.2023,THECOURTONTHESAMEDAY
DELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C)NO.155OF2023
3
JUDGMENT
When this Contempt Case was taken up, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the directions issued by this Court have been complied with and the petitioners have no further grievance.
This Cont. Case (C) is closed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
JUDGE
avs
CON.CASE(C)NO.155OF2023
4
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 155/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
MemoofChargesMEMOOFCHARGESFOR1STRESPONDENT
MemoOfChargesMEMOOFCHARGESFOR2NDRESPONDENT
MemoOfChargesMEMOOFCHARGESFOR3RDRESPONDENT
MemoofChaegesMEMOOFCHARGESFOR4THRESPONDENT
Annexure5CERTIFIEDCOPYOFTHEJUDGMENTDATED
2/6/2022INW.P.(C).NO.5716OF2022ON
THEFILEOFTHEHON'BLEHIGHCOURTOF
KERALA
Vinpin Mathew
Baburaj C.S.
A.P.M. Mohammed Hanish
Neeemateen V.
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court