Disposed

Jayesh K P v. Dr. Rajan N. Khobragade

Kerala HC6 Feb 2023Con.Case(C)/134/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt proceeding, the High Court noted that the compliance order passed earlier had not been marked to the petitioners. The court directed respondents to furnish copies immediately and noted closure of the case while reserving liberty to challenge the order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to provide and serve copies of the compliance order to the petitioners.

Jayesh K P Vs Dr. Rajan N. Khobragade — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶4

MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 17TH MAGHA, 1944

¶5

CON.CASE(C) NO. 134 OF 2023

¶6

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 17677/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

¶7

PETITIONERS:

¶8

1JAYESH K P
AGED 42 YEARS
S/O.PUSHKARAN K.D., WORKING AS SUB ENGINEER (ELE),
KSEB LTD., ELECTRICAL SECTION, VYTTILA, RESIDING AT
KIZHAKKEVALAYIL, PATTANAKKADU, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688531
2LOVESON KUNJAPPAN
AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. KUNJAPPAN, WORKING AS SUB ENGINEER (ELE),
KSEB LTD., ELECTRICAL SECTION THEVARA, RESIDING AT
MANGALATHU, KODANTHURUTHU, KUTHIYATHODE P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688533
3ANISH T.P.
AGED 41 YEARS
S/O G.PRABHAKARAN NAIR, WORKING AS SUB ENGINEER (ELE),
KSEB LTD., ELECTRICAL SECTION AMBALAPUZHA,
RESIDING AT THALIYADIL HOUSE, K.R. PURAM, CHERTHALA,
ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688524
SAJITH KUMAR V.
VIVEK A.V.
GODWIN JOSEPH
PRANAV PRADEEP
NEERAJA P.
J.VISHNU

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1DR.RAJAN N. KHOBRAGADE I.A.S
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
SECRETARY (ADMINISTRATION), VYDHUTHI BHAVANAM,
PATTOM P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004
2SANTHY K
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KSEB LTD., VYDHUTHI BHAVANAM,
PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004
SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN, SC

¶11

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

¶12

CON.CASE(C) NO. 134 OF 2023

¶13

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

Dated this the 6^th day of February, 2023

¶16

It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the

¶17

respondents that an order has been passed on 27.01.2023 in compliance

¶18

with the judgment. A copy of the order is also made available.

¶19

However, I notice that the copy of the order has not been marked to the petitioners. The learned counsel for the respondents shall make available a copy of the order to the learned counsel for the petitioners today itself and the order shall also be served on the petitioners, if not already served.

¶20

Without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioners, this contempt of court case is closed, with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order passed, if so advised.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

ANU SIVARAMAN

¶23

JUDGE

¶24

NP

¶25

CON.CASE(C) NO. 134 OF 2023

¶26

¶27

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 134/2023

¶28

PETITIONERS’ ANNEXURES

¶29

Annexure A1TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.07.2022 IN
WPC NO. 17677 OF 2021 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
Annexure A2A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.
EBGR3/GL14.06.2021/SE/PH DATED 22.08.2022
ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Annexure A3A TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL SENT BY THE 2ND
RESPONDENT INVITING THE PETITIONERS FOR
HEARING VIA ZOOM APPLICATION, DATED
12.09.2022

¶30

RESPONDENTS’ ANNEXURES: NIL

Jayesh K P v. Dr. Rajan N. Khobragade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayesh K P v. Dr. Rajan N. Khobragade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vyshak.M Vs the Mannur Gramapanchayat

Rashid Vs State of Kerala

Abdul Salam.N.P. Vs State of Kerala

Dr. a.v.Sajeev Vs Vishnuraj IAS

Kottamkara Kottachira Madancavu Sree Mahadevar Temple Vs the District Collector

Vibin.K.v Vs 1. State of Kerala