This was a contempt of court case concerning non-compliance of directions in W.P(C) No.25541/2014. The High Court closed the contempt petition on the submission that the petitioners had been discharged prior to the relevant order, rendering no case for contempt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1079 OF 2014 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WPC 25541/2014 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS2,3,4&6:
1VALSALA,AGED39YEARS,
D/O.APPIYAMMA,KIRANBHAVAN,MARUTHAMKODU,
VENPAKALP.O.
2VINITHAKUMARI
AGED41YEARS
D/O.KAMALAMMA,KRISHNAVILASOM,KUNCHUVEETUVILA,
ARANGHAMUGHAL,ARALUMOODUP.O.
3SINDHU
AGED33YEARS
D/O.PANKAJAKSHY,ROHINIBHAVAN,CHERUVILAKATHU
CHANNELKARA,ARALUMOODUP.O.
4SHEENA
AGED30YEARS
D/O.SANTHAKUMARI,KEERAPATHIMELE,KALLUVILA
PUTHENVEEDU,VENPAKALP.O.
BYADVSRI.R.T.PRADEEP
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 DR.K.M.ABRAHAMAGEANDFATHER'SNAMENOTKNOWN,SECRETARYTO
GOVERNMENT,DEPARTMENTOFSOCIALJUSTICE,GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 B. JAYAKUMARAGEANDFATHER'SNAMENOTKNOWN,THEDISTRICTSOCIAL
WELFAREOFFICER,OFFICEOFDISTRICTSOCIALWELFARE
OFFICER,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001
Cont.Case(C) No.1079 of 2014
2
3REMA
AGEANDFATHER'SNAMENOTKNOWN,ATHIYANNOOR
ADDITIONALCHILDDEVELOPMENTPROJECTOFFICER,OFFICE
OFATHIYANNOORADDITIONALCHILDDEVELOPMENTPROJECT
OFFICER,NEYYATTINKARA-695121.
SMTMARYBEENAJOSEPH,SR.GOVERNMENTPLEADER
THISCONTEMPTOFCOURTCASE(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFOR
ADMISSIONON13.11.2023,THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVERED
THEFOLLOWING:
Cont.Case(C) No.1079 of 2014
3
JUDGMENT
This Contempt Case is preferred, complaining of noncompliance of directions issued by this Court by order dated 01.10.2014 in W.P(C) No.25541 of 2014.
herein were discharged even prior to the order of status quo granted by this Court on 01.10.2014 and therefore, no case for contempt is made out.
same is pending and this Contempt Case can be closed.
In view of the said submission, this Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE
IAP
Cont.Case(C) No.1079 of 2014
4
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS’ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE1TRUECOPYOFORDERDATED1.10.2014IN
W.P(C)NO.25541/2014BYTHESINGLEJUDGEOF
THISHON’BLECOURT
VALSALA
VINITHAKUMARI
SINDHU
SHEELA
DR.K.M.ABRAHAM
B. JAYAKUMAR
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court