Allowed

Illyas v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC2 May 2023Bail Appl./703/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants regular bail to the petitioner, an accused in a police crime for offences under varied IPC sections. The High Court found no ground for detaining the petitioner further considering he was in custody for over four months and other co-accused had been granted bail.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on bail on a bond for Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties each for Rs. 1,00,000.

Illyas Vs State of Kerala — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Kerala HC (2023)

¶1

BAIL APPL. NO. 703 OF 2023

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU

¶6

TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MAY 2023 / 12TH VAISAKHA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 703 OF 2023

¶7

CRIME NO.678/2020 OF Ottapalam Police Station, Palakkad
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTCRMP 13091A/2022 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF

¶8

FIRST CLASS -I,PALAKKAD

¶9

PETITIONER/S:

¶10

ILLYAS
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O. MOIDU, THARAYIL HOUSE, AMBALAVATTAM P.O, PANAMANNA,
OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD- 679501., PIN - 679501
BY ADVS.
SUNNY MATHEW
NIKITTA TRESSY GEORGE

¶11

RESPONDENT/S:

¶12

1STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM COCHIN - 682 031, PIN - 682031
2THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
OTTAPPALAM POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT- 679101., PIN
- 679101
BY ADVS.
ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION(AG-10)
SMT.NEEMA T.V. (PP)

¶13

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.05.2023,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

BAIL APPL. NO. 703 OF 2023

¶15

¶16

K.BABU, J.

¶17

=======================

¶18

B.A No.703 of 2023

¶19

======================

¶20

Dated this the 2^nd day of May, 2023

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶23

The petitioner is accused No.10 in Crime No.678/2020 of Ottapalam Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner and other accused are punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 302 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶24

The prosecution case is that on 31.05.2020 at about 10.00 p.m, the defacto complainant was wrongfully restrained by the petitioner and the other accused and caused grievous injuries to him by means of dangerous weapons. The defacto complainant succumbed to the injuries. The petitioner remained absconding and therefore, the final report was submitted against the accused available for trial. Thereafter split charge was filed against the petitioner and the other accused.

¶25

The trial court proceeded with the trial against the accused

¶26

Nos.1,2, 4 and 6 and they were found guilty and convicted.

¶27

The petitioner was arrested on 01.12.2022 and has been in judicial custody since then.

¶28

BAIL APPL. NO. 703 OF 2023

¶29

¶30

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶31

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that accused Nos.5 and 11 were granted regular bail by this Court in B.A.Nos.2762 & 2745/2023. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody for more than four months as of now. The final report has already been submitted. The petitioner is on the same footing as that of the accused Nos.5 and 11, who had been granted bail by this Court. Therefore, I do not find any reason to detain the petitioner any further.

¶32

In such cirucmstances, the bail application is allowed on the following conditions:

¶33

(a) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.

¶34

(b) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

¶35

¶36

(d) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution

¶37

BAIL APPL. NO. 703 OF 2023

¶38

¶39

witnesses or attempt to tamper with the evidence.

¶40

(e) The petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala wihtout the permission of the jurisdictional court.

¶41

(f) The petitioner shall surrender his passport before the jurisdictional court and, in case he does not have a passport, an affidavit to that effect shall be filed.

¶42

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

¶43

sd/

¶44

K.BABU, JUDGE

¶45

jm/

Illyas v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Illyas v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Joel James Thomas Vs State of Kerala

Hashmi K.S Vs State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor

Jincy M.P., D/O. Sathyan Vs State of Kerala

Vyshak C v Vs State of Kerala

Muhammed Shiraz @ Shiraz Vs State of Kerala

Aji P P Vs State of Kerala