Allowed

Vinod K v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC13 Feb 2023Bail Appl./615/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Kerala allowed bail to an appellant under Section 439 CrPC in a criminal case involving sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324, 326, 307 and 149 of IPC. The court cited the final report filed and release of co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on conditions including executing bond for Rs.50,000/- with two solvent sureties and prohibitions against intimidation of witnesses or involvement in other offences.

Vinod K Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN

¶4

MONDAY, THE 13^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 24TH MAGHA, 1944

¶5

BAIL APPL. NO. 615 OF 2023

¶6

CRIME NO.1495 OF 2022 OF KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION, KANNUR

¶7

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:

¶8

VINOD K AGED 40 YEARS, S/O VENU, VIJAYA NIVAS, PALLIYAMOOLA, CHALAD POST, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670014 BY ADV P.K.RAVISANKAR

¶9

RESPONDENT:

¶10

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.NEEMA T.V. - SR.PP

¶11

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

B.A.No. 615 of 2023

ORDER

Dated this the 13^th day of February, 2023

¶16

This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code

¶17

of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail and the petitioner is the 1^st accused in crime No.1495/2022 of Kannur Town Police Station

¶18

where accused alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324, 326, 307 and 149 of IPC.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary and the materials placed by the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶20

The prosecution allegation is that, at about 11.30 pm on 18.12.2022, the accused formed themselves into an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons with knowledge that they are members of the said assembly and physically assaulted the defacto complainant and his friend and caused serious injuries to them, with intention to murder them.

¶21

It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, as per bail application No.573 of 2023, accused Nos.2 to 7 sought the relief of regular bail, this Court while

¶22

B.A.No. 615 of 2023

¶23

¶24

granting bail to accused Nos.3 to 7, dismissed the bail plea of the 2^nd accused, noting his criminal antecedents. Thereafter, this Court granted bail to the 2^nd accused also vide B.A. No. 1041 of 2023 stating that, further detention of the 2^nd accused in custody, is not warranted since the Final Report already filed.

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner has been in custody from 23.12.2022. Since all other accused were granted bail by this Court, the petitioner is also liable to be released on bail.

¶26

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed grant of bail to the petitioner, highlighting his criminal antecedents and the seriousness of the offences.

¶27

However, taking note of the fact that, the petitioner has been in custody from 23.12.2022 and the other accused persons were released on bail, further detention of the petitioner in custody, is not warranted since Final Report already filed, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this petition stands allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail on conditions:

¶28

i. The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties, each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional court concerned.

¶29

B.A.No. 615 of 2023

¶30

¶31

ii. The petitioner shall not intimidate the witnesses

¶32

or tamper with evidence. He shall co-operate with the trial and shall be available for trial.

¶33

iii. The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case, so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court.

¶34

iv. The petitioner shall not involve in any other offence during the currency of bail and any such event, if re ported or came to the notice of this court, the same shall be a reason to cancel the bail hereby granted.

¶35

Sd/-

¶36

A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE

¶37

Vinod K v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod K v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zuhara Vs State of Kerala

Rajesh Vs State of Kerala

Rejin R.L Vs State of Kerala

Yadav Vs the State of Kerala

Jobin Jose Vs State of Kerala

Muhammed Shafath Khan Vs State of Kerala