Faisal, v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed a pre-arrest bail application filed by a petitioner accused of cheating in Uttar Pradesh. Noting the absence of arrest material, the Court extended an existing interim non-arrest order by one month to allow the petitioner to address the proceedings in the foreign state.
What did the court decide?
The existing interim order not to arrest the petitioner is extended for a period of one month.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 29TH KARTHIKA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 6103 OF 2023
CRIME NO.6/2023 OF KAKADEV POLICE STATION, UTTARPRADESH
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
FAISAL, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.K.C MOIDU, RAHATH MANZIL, M.M NAGAR, MUTTAMBALAM P.O., KANJIKUZHI, KOTTAYAM-686002 BY ADVS. T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF NITHIN A.R.
RESPONDENTS/ COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031 2 INSPECTOR, KAKADEV POLICE STATION, CENTRAL COMMISSIONERATE, KANPUR NAGAR, UTTAR PRADESH, PIN - 208019 3 DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686002 4 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTTAYAM, WEST POLICE STATION, PIN - 686001 5 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTTAYAM EAST POLICE STATION, PIN - 686002 SRI. M.C. ASHI, PP
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant an extension of an interim non-arrest order to the petitioner facing allegations of cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal conspiracy in Uttar Pradesh.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
FAISAL
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court