The court dismissed a bail application as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the High Court had already quashed the criminal proceedings in an earlier order dated 02.11.2021.
The bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 19TH SRAVANA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 3650 OF 2021
CRIME NO.686/2021 OF ATTINGAL POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
RAMESH R C @UNNI AGED 22 YEARS MAVARAVILA VEEDU, KADUVAYIL, ATTINGAL P .O THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 101. BY ADV GEORGE SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 031. BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.08.2023, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A. No. 3650/2021
: 2 :
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
B.A. No. 3650 of 2021
ORDER
When the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court, as per order dated 02.11.2021 in Crl.M.C. No. 4641 of 2021, quashed the proceedings in
Crime No. 686 of 2021, where the petitioner sought anticipatory bail.
In view of the above, this bail application has become
infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous.
sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE
Rv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application is infructuous having regard to the prior quashing of criminal proceedings.
RAMESH R C @UNNI
STATE OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
