Sachin Sukmaran v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application filed under section 438 CrPC, the petitioner sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a death investigation case where the FIR registered under Section 174 CrPC had not incorporated any offences or named accused, leading the Court to close the application.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 23RD JYAISHTA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 2997 OF 2023
CRIME NO. 202 OF 2023 OF PULPALLY TOWN POLICE STATION,
MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
SACHIN SUKMARAN
AGED 29 YEARS
S/O SUKMARAN KARUVARAKKAL HOUSE PADICHIRA POST,
PULPALLY WAYANAD, PIN - 673592
BY ADVS.
CHERIAN MATHEW POOTHICOTE
GEORGE G.POOTHICOTE
AJITH VILLY GEORGE
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the underlying FIR has not been registered with incorporated offences.
Whether the High Court is required to record further orders in a case where no criminal proceeding has been instituted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SACHIN SUKMARAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court