Sajeev v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitions for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was dismissed as the petitioner failed to appear in court and chose not to proceed with the matter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 2992 OF 2021
CRIME NO.1182/2019 OF AIROOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
SAJEEV AGED 36 YEARS, KALATHARA HOUSE, AYIROOR, VARAKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695141 BY ADV K.P.SUJESH KUMAR
RESPONDENT:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 XXX AGED 39 YEARS XXX BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PP - M P PRASANTH
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAJEEV
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
A. BADHARUDEEN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court