Rajmohan v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of representation on the date. Court noted trial was at fag end and judgment imminent.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed for non-appearance of petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1944
BAIL APPL. NO. 1155 OF 2023
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3:
RAJ MOHAN
AGED 28 YEARS
S/O REMANY, ILLIKKAPARAMPIL VEEDU, NAZRATH, MATTANCHERRY P.O.
KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682001
BY ADVS.
SURESH JOSEPH
SANALKUMAR.B
RESPONDENTS:
1STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN -
682031
2THE INSPECTOR
EXCISE RANGE OFFICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695582
BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
T V NEEMA SR PP
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application shall be allowed given the absence of representation and the stage of trial.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJ MOHAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE INSPECTOR EXCISE RANGE OFFICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court