Dismissed
Rosamma Joseph v. T.F. Varghese
Kerala HCAS/270/2002
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed Appeal No. 270 of 2002 due to non-prosecution after recording that the appellant had no instruction from the parties.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
¶4
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1944
AS NO. 270 OF 2002
¶5
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.8.2000 IN O.S.NO.1034/1986 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR
¶6
APPELLANTS/LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED DEFENDANT:
¶7
1ROSAMMA JOSEPH,
W/O.LATE T.F.JOSEPH,
THOPPIL HOUSE, KURUPPAM ROAD,
THRISSUR.
2PUSHPAM MATHEW,
REP. BY 1ST APPELLANT
(POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER) ROSAMMA JOSEPH,
W/O.LATE T.F.JOSEPH,
THOPPIL HOUSE, KURUPPAM ROAD,
THRISSUR.
3FRANCIS THOPPIL,
DIAS PEREIRA NAGAR
H I FLAT NO.1, NAIGAON, VASAI (DIST.),
BOMBAY.
4JOSE JOSEPH,
S/O. LATE T.F. JOSEPH
THOPPIL HOUSE, KURUPPAM ROAD,
THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.
SMT.SHAHNA KARTHIKEYAN
SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN
¶8
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
¶9
T.F. VARGHESE,
S/O.LATE T.O.FRANCIS,
THOPPIL HOUSE, MANALUR,
TRICHUR DISTRICT,
THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.GOPAL
SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER SR.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
ROSAMMA JOSEPH
- respondent
T.F. VARGHESE
Coram
AI extract
P.SOMARAJAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court