The Kerala High Court dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent and no representation appeared for the appellant on the dates of hearing.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 26TH JYAISHTA, 1945
AS NO. 205 OF 2003
OS 161/1998 OF SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 12.11.2002 APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
SUPER TRANSPORT COMPANY A.M.ROAD, KOTHAMANGALAM BY ADVS. SRI.KKM.SHERIF SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
M/S.TATA TEA LIMITED MUNNAR, REPRESENTED BY THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIAN INSURANCE CO.LTD. MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV SRI.T.J.LAKSHMANAN IYER
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 16.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.S.No.205 of 2003
-: 2 :-
Sathish Ninan, J.
==============================
A.S.No.205 of 2003
==========================
Dated this the 16th day of June, 2023
JUDGMENT
The appeal was listed on 14/06/2023 and
15/06/2023 on which dates there was no representation for the appellant. Today also there is no representation for the appellant. The appellant called absent. Hence this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge
rsr
SUPER TRANSPORT COMPANY A.M.ROAD, KOTHAMANGALAM
M/S.TATA TEA LIMITED MUNNAR
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
