Janardhanan v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner argued that the challenged grievance regarding land tax acceptance was redressed on submission. The court held no further orders were required and closed the writ petition. No substantive legal issues were decided.
What did the court decide?
No further orders; writ petition closed as grievance was redressed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 19TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 9613 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
JANARDHANAN AGED 70 YEARS S/O. RAMASWAMY KURIKKAL, ALIKKALIPARAMBIL HOUSE, PRANAVAM, LAKKIDI P.O, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT – 679 301.
BY ADV BINOY VASUDEVAN
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPALAM TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT – 679 101.
- 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER LAKKIDI PEROOR II VILLAGE, LAKKIDI P.O, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT – 679 301.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JANARDHANAN
- respondent
THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPALAM TALUK
- respondent
THE VILLAGE OFFICER LAKKIDI PEROOR II VILLAGE
- respondent
ARCHANA D/O. SIVASANKARAN
- respondent
SMT. C. S. SHEEJA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court