impugned amendment rules apply to all schools including minority institutions equally, there cannot be any exemption to the minority institutions from the application of the amendment rules 2016. The Teachers' bank envisages inclusion of all teachers coming under its parameters, irrespective of the Schools from which they were retrenched. In the counter affidavit it is stated that there are 2236 aided schools having minority status. The number of protected teachers from 146 of such schools is 386 after the 2015-16 staff fixation. The number of teachers being included in Teachers' bank is always on the ascending order, as long as the management does not take any action to protect the teachers, who happen to be retrenched from their schools, and the rules governing staff fixation, method of appointment under them are the same, they cannot have any special privilege and they cannot evade from their responsibility in appointing the teachers from Teachers' bank. No privileges can be granted to them by fastening liabilities on non-minority institutions. There is no difference in financial burden of Government on minority as well as non-minority schools. The eligibility for protection to the teachers, who are retrenched from minority as well as non-minority schools, is the same. Therefore, liability to accommodate them has to be thrust upon minority as well as non-minority schools, without causing undue advantages or disadvantages to any of such institutions. None of the Managers of minority schools have a case that their teachers need not be included in the teachers' bank, on retrenchment or that such teachers need not be deployed. At any rate, there cannot be any unequal treatment on the basis of the status of the institution. The freedom of the minority institutions to appoint the head of the schools who are administering their schools is not in any way interfered with.
