Dismissed

J.R.Chandrika Kumari, v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC7 Nov 2022WP(C)/6901/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition subject to liberty to prosecute a review petition filed before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on its merits of merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to prosecute the review petition filed before the Tribunal.

J.R.Chandrika Kumari, Vs State of Kerala — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

¶4

MONDAY, THE 7^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1944

¶5

WP(C) NO. 6901 OF 2022

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

J.R.CHANDRIKA KUMARI, AGED 68 YEARS D/O. C.J.JANAKI, T.C. 11/36(1), KANAKKA NAGAR, NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 003.

¶8

BY ADVS. G.SUDHEER R.HARIKRISHNAN (H-308)

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANNTHAPURAM-695 001.

¶11

2 CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.

¶12

3 SABITHA BEEVI, AGED 63 YEARS W/O. ABDUL HAMEED, TC 11/665(1), NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.

¶13

BY ADVS.

¶14

SMT.K.G.SAROJINI GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR,STANDING COUNSEL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.) SMT.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY, STANDING COUNSEL SMT.ANAGHA LAKSHMY RAMAN SRI.S.VINOD BHAT SMT.GREESHMA CHANDRIKA.R

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

¶16

FOLLOWING:

¶17

WP(C) NO.6901 OF 2022 2

¶18

J U D G M E N T

¶19

Dated this the 7^th day of November, 2022

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶21

petitioner has already filed Ext.P16 Review Petition before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions and the petitioner

¶22

may be permitted to prosecute the same, withdrawing the writ petition.

¶23

In view of the submission made as above, the petitioner

¶24

is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to prosecute Ext.P16 Review Petition before the Tribunal. Granting such

¶25

liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH

JUDGE

sss

WP(C) NO.6901 OF 2022

¶31

¶32

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6901/2022

¶33

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶34

Exhibit P1	TRUE COPY OF THE AND (2) OF KERALA NO. TPE 14/120717	STOP MEMO UNDER 406 (1) MUNICIPALITIES ACT WITH /16 DATED 7.11.2016.
Exhibit P2	TRUE COPY OF THE NO. 32394/2016 OF	COMMON JUDGMENT IN W.P.C THIS HON'BLE COURT.
Exhibit P3	TRUE COPY OF THE 21.06.2017 IN W.P THIS HON'BLE COUR	JUDGMENT DATED .C NO. 18388/2017 OF T.
Exhibit P4	TRUE COPY OF THE SECRETARY OF 2ND E.14/181864/16 DA	PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT WITH NO. TED 3.2.2018.
Exhibit P5	TRUE COPY OF THE W.P.C NO. 31911/2	COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN 017 DATED 17.10.2019.
Exhibit P6	TRUE COPY OF THE IN W.P.C NO. 3161 COURT.	JUDGMENT DATED 7.1.2020 0/2019 OF THIS HON'BLE
Exhibit P7	TRUE COPY OF THE DATED 12.2.2020 I RESPONDENT.	ORDER NO. E14/10150/20 SSUED BY THE 2ND
Exhibit P8	TRUE COPY OF THE IN W.A. NO. 409/2 COURT.	JUDGMENT DATED 17.3.2020 020 OF THIS HON'BLE
Exhibit P9	TRUE COPY OF THE 14/10150/20 DATED 406(3) OF MUNICIP THE 2ND RESPONDEN	CONFIRMATION ORDER NO. E 31.5.2021 UNDER SECTION ALITIES ACT ISSUED BY T.
Exhibit P10	TRUE COPY OF THE 22.9.2020 FILED B THE 2ND RESPONDEN	OBJECTION DATED Y THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO T.
Exhibit P11	TRUE COPY OF THE WITHOUT EXHIBITS RESPONDENT BEFORE SELF GOVERNMENT I 21.06.2021.	APPEAL NO. 301/2021 FILED BY THE 3RD THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL NSTITUTIONS DATED

¶35

WP(C) NO.6901 OF 2022

¶36

Exhibit P12	TRUE COPY OF 2ND RESPONDE BEFORE THE T GOVERNMENT I FEB.2022.	THE NT I RIBU NSTI	STATEMENT FILED BY THE N APPEAL NO. 301/2021 NAL FOR LOCAL SELF TUTIONS DATED NIL
Exhibit P13	TRUE COPY OF IMPLEADING P RESPONDENT D	THE ETIT ATED	APPLICATION FOR IONER AS ADDITIONAL 2ND 13.12.2021
Exhibit P14	TRUE COPY OF 1279/2021 IN THE TRIBUNAL INSTITUTIONS	THE APP FOR DAT	ORDER IN I.A. NO. AL NO. 301/2021 PASSED BY LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT ED 20.01.2022.
Exhibit P15	TRUE COPY OF THE 2ND RESP IN APPEAL NO BEFORE THE T GOVERNMENT I	THE ONDE . 30 RIBU NSTI	REVIEW PETITION FILED BY NT IN I.A. NO. 1270/2021 1/2021 DATED 10.02.2022 NAL FOR LOCAL SELF TUTION.
Exhibit P16	TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION APPEAL NO. 3 THE TRIBUNAL INSTITUTION.	THE ER I 01/2 FOR	REVIEW PETITION FILED BY .A. NO. 1270/2021 IN 021 DATED 8.2.2022 BEFORE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT
Exhibit P17	TRUE COPY OF BY THE ADVOC TRIBUNAL ON IN APPEAL NO	THE ATE 15/0 .301	COMMISSION REPORT FILED COMMISSIONER BEFORE THE 7/2022 IN IA.NO.410/2022 /2021.

J.R.Chandrika Kumari, v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.R.Chandrika Kumari, v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Kumar Ramakrishnan Kallada Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

Suresh Kumar Ramakrishnan Kallada Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

Suresh Kumar Ramakrishnan Kallada, Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Muhammed Haneefa Vs the Village Officer

Smt. Maria Fagi Vs Divisional Forest Officer

B.Vinodkumar Vs District Collector