High Court at Ernakulam disposed of a writ petition challenging a transfer order in a employment dispute where the respondents stated they would not implement the order or disturb the petitioner, leading to closure of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 27TH ASWINA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 6546 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
SUJAMOL P. AGED 48 YEARS D/O. P. K. PURUSHOTHAMAN, SELECTION GRADE TYPIST, DISTRICT KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA, NOW RESIDING AT MAKAYIRAM, VALIYA VEEDU, MANNANCHERRY P. O., ALAPPUZHA. BY ADVS. S.SANAL KUMAR BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN T.J.SEEMA
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SECRETARY KERALA KHADI & GRAMA VYVASAYA BOARD, VANCHIYOOR P. O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 035. 2 THE PROJECT OFFICER DISTRICT KHADI & GRAMA VYVASAYA BOARD, COLLECTORATE ROAD, ALAPPUZHA - 688 001. BY ADVS. N.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD() P.RAMAKRISHNAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)No.6546 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 19th day of October, 2022
This writ petition is filed challenging an order
of transfer.
and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
Counsel for the respondents that the respondents do
not intend to implement the transfer order or to disturb the petitioner at present.
The said submission is recorded. The writ petition is closed.
Sd/ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE
SSK/19/10
W.P.(C)No.6546 OF 2022
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
| Exhibit | P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE BOOKING RECEIPT DATED 14.09.2021 ISSUED BY THE GURUVAYOOR DEVASWOM. |
|---|---|
| Exhibit | P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.11.2021 TO THE PETITIONER. |
| Exhibit | P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 27.01.2022 TO THE PETITIONER. |
| Exhibit | P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED 31.01.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. |
| Exhibit | P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSFER ORDER DATED 23.02.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. |
| Exhibit | P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE RELIEVING ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 23.02.2022. |
| Exhibit | P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.09.2018 IN WP(C) NO.28760/2018. |
| Exhibit | P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE KERALA KHADI BOARD EMPLOYEES UNION DATED 24.02.2022. |
| Exhibit | P9 TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE MEMO DATED 17/03/2022 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER |
| Exhibit | P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER APPOINTING ENQUIRY OFFICER DATED 17/03/2022 |
| Exhibit | P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 25-7-2022 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. |
| Exhibit | P12 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 30-7-2022. |
| Exhibit | P13 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 23-9-2022. |
| RESPONDE EXHIBIT |
NT'S EXHIBITS R1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE LEAVE APPLICATION DATED 25.10.2021 |
SSK //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the writ petition challenging a transfer order wherein respondents do not intend to implement the order or disturb the petitioner.
Sujamol P.
The Secretary Kerala Khadi & Grama Vyvasaya Board
The Project Officer District Khadi & Grama Vyvasaya Board
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
