Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 14TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 6319 OF 2012
PETITIONER:
JASMIN ALIAS JASMI ALIAS JASMINA SHAFI W/O. MUHAMMED SHAFI ALIAS A.M. SHAFI, RESIDING AT RUKKIYA MANZIL, VELAVOOR PIRAPPACODE P. O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV SRI.VARGHESE PREM
RESPONDENT:
STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE NEDUMANGAD BRANCH, PB NO.3, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 541 REPRESENTED BY THE AUTHORISED OFFICER(CHIEF MANAGER).
BY ADV SRI.R.S.KALKURA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.6319 OF 2012
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
SPR
Jasmin alias Jasmi alias Jasmina Shafi
State Bank of Travancore
Murali Purushothaman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
