P.S.Gopalakrishnan Nair v. the Kseb
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala held that as the petitioners were underrepresented and no surviving grievance representation was received, the writ petitions filed for gratuity payments were closed without disposing the substantive claim.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
TUESDAY,THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 6072 OF 2011
PETITIONERS:
1 P.S.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR S/O.P.N.SEKHARAN NAIR, PAIKKATTU HOUSE, ANCHIRI POST,ALAKKODE VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. (GC.82/04)
2 P.K.RADHAKRISHNAN S/O.P.N.KRISHNA PILLAI, PALANICKAL HOUSE, THODUPUZHA POST, THODUPUZHA VILLAGE,THODUPUZHA TALUK. (GC 93/04)
3 P.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR S/O.M.G.PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, DEVI KRISHNA HOUSE,THODUPUZHA EAST POST, KARIKKODE VILLAGE,THODUPUZHA TALUK. (GC.189/05)
BY ADV SRI.P.V.SANTHOSH JOSE
RESPONDENTS:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.S. Gopalakrishnan Nair
- petitioner
P.K. Radhakrishnan
- petitioner
P.K. Gopinathan Nair
- respondent
The Kerala State Electricity Board
- respondent
The Controlling Authority Under The Payment Of Gratuity Act
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court