V.Vinodini v. the Special Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without detailed reasoning.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 17TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 561 OF 2014
PETITIONER/S:
V.VINODINI
VALUVIL HOUSE, ERANHIKKAL P.O., ELATHUR, KOZHIKKODE-673303.
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN SMT.M.H.BINDU
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LA KOZHIKKODE-673303.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.VINODINI
- respondent
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LA KOZHIKKODE-673303
- respondent
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD ROADS DIVISION, KOZHIKKODE-673303
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court