Subash K.K. v. Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
On its own motion noting fresh orders, the court classified the writ petition as infructuous and ordered it closed with liberty to challenge the new orders.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed as infructuous with liberty to challenge orders subsequently passed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 5547 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:
1 SUBASH K.K. AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.CHINNAN PILLA, MANJIKKAPALLIYIL, CHOTTUPARA(PO), CHOTTUPARA, IDUKKI – 685 552.
2 RAJESH.T.H, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O THANKAPANDIYAN, JUGAN ILLAM, VANDANMED, KATTAPANA, IDUKKI-685551.
3 SANIMON.B.V, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O BOBBY, PARAYKKAL, MATHAIPARA(P.O), KOTHAPARA, IDUKKI-685505.
BY ADVS. K.RAJESH KANNAN K.NIRMALAN
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 KATTAPPANA MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI-685508.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subash K.K. and others
- respondent
Kattappana Municipality and others
Coram
T.R. RAVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court