Benny Mathew v. Executive Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner, a farmer, sought a writ direction compelling the Superintending Engineer to consider a representation regarding blocked drainage causing water ingress into his premises. The court directed the respondent to consider the representation within six weeks. The petitioner's representative was listed as a second respondent. The judgment briefly mentions the petitioner's advocate before l
What did the court decide?
The petitioner was ordered to consider Ext.P2 representation submitted by the petitioner within six weeks, after giving an opportunity of hearing to affected parties.