Abdulla v. the Circle Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses the writ petition as infructuous, noting that the matter has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 4TH JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 38550 OF 2016
PETITIONER/S:
1 ABDULLA AGED 52 YEARS AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMED HANEEFA, CHIRAVILAKATHU VEEDU, POTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT
2 NOUSHAD AGED 40 YEARS S/O. HASSAN KUNJU, VILAYIL VEEDU, PLAMOODU, POTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3 M.A RASHEED AGED 70 YEARS S/O. A1 AMEEN NIVAS, KUDAPPANAMOODU PO., POTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4 HASSANKUTTY AGED 40 YEARS S/O. AISHBEEVI, CHETHANPADU, KONCHIRA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA)
RESPONDENT/S:
BY ADVS. SRI.V.SURESH SRI.G.SUDHEER
OTHER PRESENT:
GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 38550 OF 2016
2
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the
matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
sab
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 38550 OF 2016
3
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 38550/2016
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.11.2016.
ABDULLA
NOUSHAD
M.A RASHEED
HASSANKUTTY
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE POTHENCODE
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE POTHENCODE
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court