The High Court of Kerala dismissed WP(C) No. 3385 of 2017 as infructuous following the submission by counsel representing the petitioners, without detailed reasoning.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 3385 OF 2017
PETITIONER/S:
AGED 64 YEARS, S/O GOPALA PILLAI, CHELLAM VIHAR, NADUVILAKKARA UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM.
W/O YESYBHAVAN, NADUVILAKKARA, UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM.
KANVAL VEEDU, NADUVILAKKARA, UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM.
SAJAY HOSUE, NADUVILAKKARA, UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM.
GOPALA MANDIRAM, NADUVILAKKARA, UMAYANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM.
BY ADV SRI.R.KISHORE (KALLUMTHAZHAM)
RESPONDENTS:
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 3385 OF 2017
2
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel Sri. Amar S.R., representing
Sri. R.Kishore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
al/-
SASI KUMAR
MARY SHOBHA
APPUKUTTAN PILLAI
FRANCIS
LEELAMMA KOTTAKKATHU URAYIDAM
SASIKALA
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
