Mohanan v. Rukmini
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an order and notice via writ, but since a revision in the Sessions Court was pending, the court allowed raising contentions there and closed the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to raise contentions in pending revision in Sessions Court; writ petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(C) NO. 29462 OF 2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 16TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 29462 OF 2013
PETITIONER/S:
MOHANAN S/O.MADHAVAN, SUBHA VILASOM, PERUMBELI, KARUMBAYAM P.O., KALLARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 603.
BY ADV SRI.M.DINESH
RESPONDENT/S:
1 RUKMINI AGED 70 YEARS W/O.SOMARAJAN, CHARUVILA VEEDU, PERUMBELI, KARUMBAYAM P.O., KALLARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 608.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be closed in the interest of justice while the matter is sub judice in the revisional court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MOHANAN S/O.MADHAVAN
- respondent
RUKMINI AGED 70 YEARS W/O.SOMARAJAN
- respondent
SECRETARY KALLARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT
- respondent
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court