S.Satheesh Kumar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC18 Nov 2022WP(C)/2897/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment lists three connected writ petitions challenging industry categorization and wage notifications. The court found the petitions infructuous due to subsequent orders and closed them with liberty to challenge those subsequent orders if needed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to challenge subsequent orders if aggrieved; contentions left open.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Liberty to challenge subsequent orders if aggrieved; contentions left open.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 27TH KARTHIKA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 9374 OF 2010

¶5

PETITIONERS:

¶6

1 ALL KERALA FEDERATION OF PETROLEUM TRAD TRADERS, 4/2880, MARUTHI BUILDING,, PROVIDENCE ROAD, KOCHI-682 018,, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.RADHAKRISHNAN.

¶7

2 T.A.BALARAMAN, PARTNER BALARAM & COMPANY, BHATAT PETROLEUM DEALERS,, ROUND WEST, THRISSUR-680 001.

¶8

BY ADVS.
SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR
SRI.V.J.ANAND
SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS
SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,, LABOUR & REHABILITATION DEPARTMENT,, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶11

A compact analysis

`PETITIO`	`NER`	`EXHIBITS`
`Exhibit`	`P1`	`PHOTOSTAT COPY` `DATED 4.5.1990` `CORPORATION LT`	`OF` `OF` `D.`	`THE COMMUNICATION` `THE INDIAN OIL`
`Exhibit`	`P2`	`PHOTOSTAT COPY` `REGISTRATION D` `KERALA GENERAL` `FAVOUR OF THE`	`OF` `ATED` `SAL` `PETI`	`THE CERTIFICATE OF` `27.4.2006 UNDER` `ES TAX RULES, IN` `TIONER.`
`Exhibit`	`P3`	`PHOTOSTAT COPY` `26.1.2012 OF T`	`OF` `HE 3`	`THE NOTICE DATED` `RD RESPONDENT.`
`Exhibit`	`P4`	`PHOTOSTAT COPY` `NOTIFICATION D`	`OF` `ATED`	`THE DRAFT` `16.11.2010`
`Exhibit`	`P5`	`PHOTOSTAT COPY` `NOTIFICATION D`	`OF` `ATED`	`THE FINAL` `22.6.2011`
`Exhibit`	`P6`	`PHOTOSTAT COPY` `06.09.2011 IN` `THIS HON'BLE C`	`OF` `WPC` `OURT`	`THE ORDER DT` `NO.24303 OF 2011 OF` `.`
`Exhibit`	`P7`	`PHOTOSTAT COPY` `DETAILS.`	`OF`	`THE RATION CARD`
`Exhibit`	`P8`	`PHOTOSTAT COPY` `CERTIFICATE DT` `S.SATHEESH KUM`	`OF` `21.` `AR.`	`THE DEATH` `07.2014 OF`

`PETITION`	`ER EXH`	`IBITS`
`Exhibit`	`P1`	`TRUE COPY` `CERTIFICAT` `26.3.2011` `LITERARY S` `SOCIETIES`	`OF 1ST PETITIONER'S` `E OF REGISTRATION DATED` `UNDER THE TRAVANCORE` `CIENTIFIC AND CHARITABLE` `ACT.`
`Exhibit`	`P2`	`TRUE COPY` `16.11.2010`	`OF DRAFT NOTIFICATION DATED` `ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT.`
`Exhibit`	`P3`	`TRUE COPY` `THE 1ST PE` `NOTIFICATI`	`OF OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY` `TITIONER TO P2 DRAFT` `ON.DATED 13-1-2011`
`Exhibit`	`P4`	`TRUE COPY` `22.6.2011`	`OF FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED` `ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT`
`Exhibit`	`P5`	`TRUE COPY` `AND EXPENS` `BEFORE IMP` `NOTIFICATI`	`OF TABLE SHOWING THE INCOME` `ES OF A PETROLEUM DEALER` `LEMENTATION OF EXT-P4` `ON`
`Exhibit`	`P6`	`TRUE COPY` `ON INCOME` `DEALER ONC`	`OF TABLE SHOWING THE IMPACT` `AND EXPENSE OF A PETROLEUM` `E EXT P4 NOTIFICATION`
`Exhibit`	`P7`	`TRUE COPY` `WAGES PAYA`	`OF TABLE SHOWING THE MINIMUM` `BLE IN TAMIL NADU`
`Exhibit`	`P8`	`TRUE COPY` `14.2.2011` `IN W.P. (C`	`OF STAY ORDER DATED` `PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT` `) 9374/2010.`

S.Satheesh Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Mathew Vs Nisamuddin

M.Retnakaran Vs Aboobacker Siddique

Sukesh S. Vs State of Kerala

C.M.Salim Vs the Kerala Motor Transport Workers

S.Satheesh Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Mathew Vs Nisamuddin

M.Retnakaran Vs Aboobacker Siddique

Sukesh S. Vs State of Kerala

C.M.Salim Vs the Kerala Motor Transport Workers

Coram

Pankajavally M.B. Vs Kseb and Another