Lilly Paul v. the Revenue Divisional Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed by a landowner seeking removal of her property from the data bank under the Kerala Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. The Court directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner's pending application within one month.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the first respondent to consider Form No. 5 application within one month from receipt of judgment copy.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 28365 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
LILLY PAUL
AGED 50 YEARS
W/O. PAUL, KARIPPELY HOUSE, RAYAMANGALAM P.O, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK,
PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683545.
BY ADVS.
N.K.KARNIS
LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 686661.
2 VILLAGE OFFICER, RAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE OFFICE, RAYAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683545.
3 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER/CONVENER, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, CONSTITUTED UNDER THE KERALA PADDY LAND AND WET LAND ACT, 2008, AGRICULTURAL OFFICE, RAYAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683545.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first respondent must consider the petitioner's unconsidered application under Form No. 5 notwithstanding Form No. 6 having been allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lilly Paul
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer Muvattupuzha
- respondent
Village Officer, Rayamangalam Village Office
- respondent
The Agricultural Officer/Convener, Local Level Monitoring Committee
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court