The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without detailed reasoning, relying on the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 2752 OF 2012
PETITIONERS:
BY ADVS. SRI.BABU S. NAIR SMT.SMITHA BABU
RESPONDENTS:
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.2752 of 2012
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
TR
RANEESH S/O.RAMADASAN
I.K.SUNIL KUMAR S/O.SUKUMARAN
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE, KOZHIKODE
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER KOZHIKODE
THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, KOZHIKODE
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
