Dismissed

Akhil Krishna E S., v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC15 Sept 2022WP(C)/27091/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners in a writ petition filed under WP(C) No. 27091 of 2022 sought to close the matter on grounds of a filed anticipatory bail application. The high court ordered the writ petition to be closed, without prejudice to contentions. No substantive relief or legal principle was established.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed without prejudice to the contentions of the parties.

Akhil Krishna E S., Vs State of Kerala — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 15^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 24TH BHADRA, 1944

¶5

WP(C) NO. 27091 OF 2022

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

1 AKHIL KRISHNA E S., AGED 21 YEARS S/O E.S.SAJUMON, EDAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VILAYATHUNADU P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 101. 2 E.S.SAJUMON, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O LATE V.K.SHANKUNNI, EDAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VILAYATHUNADU P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 101. BY ADVS. SAJITH KUMAR V. J.VISHNU VIVEK A.V. GODWIN JOSEPH

¶8

RESPONDENTS:

¶9

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE POLICE HEADQUARTERS, VELLAYAMBALAM, CITYTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PINCODE-695 010. 3 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, SH 16, OPP. POWER HOUSE, ALUVA, KERALA 683 101. 4 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHENGAMANAD POLICE STATION CHENGAMANAD, PIN- 683 578. 5 YYYY XXX BY ADVS. NIRMAL V NAIR M.ANEESH ARATHI PRABHAKARAN MUHAMMED NASEEF BIN SALIM BY SRI. T.K. SHAJAHAN, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶10

WP(C).No.27091 OF 2022

¶11

¶12

JUDGMENT Dated this the 15^th day of September, 2022

¶13

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that an anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioners and that the writ petition, therefore, can be closed.

¶14

The writ petition is closed, without prejudice to the contentions of the parties.

¶15

Sd/ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE

¶16

SSK/15/09

¶17

WP(C).No.27091 OF 2022

¶18

¶19

APPENDIX

¶20

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶21

Exhibit P1	A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT AGA POLICE HARASSMENT SUBMITTED BY	INST THE
	1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE DIST	RICT
	POLICE CHIEF ERNAKULAM, ALONG	WITH
	ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT D 20.07.2020.	ATED
Exhibit P2	A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPL	AINT
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS	SUBMITTED BY THE MOTHER OF THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE STATE PO CHIEF, DATED 20.08.2022.	5TH LICE
Exhibit R5(A)	A TRUE COPY OF THE ULTRA SOUND	SCAN
	REPORT DATED 16.7.2022 OF THE	5TH
	RESPONDENT'S ABDOMEN.
Exhibit R5(B)	A TRUE COPY OF THE HAEMATOLOGY	LAB
	INVESTIGATION REPORT DATED NIL OF	THE
	5TH RESPONDENT ISSUED BY	THE
	GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLL ERNAKULAM.	EGE,
Exhibit R5(C)	A TRUE COPY OF THE MED CERTIFICATE DATED 4.8.2022.	ICAL

Akhil Krishna E S., v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhil Krishna E S., v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar a. Vs Rajesh Kumar Singh IAS

T.C.Biju Vs Rahesh Kumar.R, Thrissur Corporation

Unnikrishnan Vs Sri. Vibhushanan

Unnikrishnan K. R., Vs the State of Kerala

Dr.Salini G.K. Vs District Meidcal Officer

Anand Bhavan Central School, Vs the District Police Chief