Ambika.K.G v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed the writ petition as, on counsel's admission during admission proceedings, the petitioner had received the amount and agreed not to prosecute the matter.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 15TH MAGHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 26686 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
AMBIKA K.G., W/O.DINAS, AGED 51 YEARS, CHIRAMEL HOUSE, NORTH PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM 683 513.
BY ADV NIDHI BALACHANDRAN(K/307/1999)
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
- 2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM 682 030.
- 3 BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, VADAKKEKKARA BRANCH, ERNAKULAM 683 522.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AMBIKA K.G.
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM
- respondent
BANK OF INDIA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court