Dismissed
Krishnalal G. v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCWP(C)/2576/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous in a civil writ proper regarding the State and a private company.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
¶4
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 2576 OF 2017
¶5
PETITIONER:
¶6
KRISHNALAL G.
AGED 38 YEARS
LAL BHAVAN, MANKAMKUZHY P.OVETTIYAR,MAVELIKKARA
ALAPPUZHA 690 558
¶7
BY ADVS.
SRI.VINEETH KOMALACHANDRAN
SMT.AMY DENNY
¶8
RESPONDENTS:
¶9
1STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF
SECRETARY(INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE)ROOM NO 1594TH FLOOR,
NORTH BLOCK, SECRETARIATTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
¶10
2AUTOKAST LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTORSN PURAM
POSTCHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA 688 582
¶11
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.ANAND SR.
SMT.RASHMI K.M., SR.GP.
SMT.LATHA ANAND, SC, AUTOKAST LTD.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
KRISHNALAL G.
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
AUTOKAST LIMITED
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court