Biju Abraham v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge order directing the 2nd respondent to consider exhibition P4 representing for monetary benefits as Warrant Officer within two months.
What did the court decide?
Direction to 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P4 and pass orders within two months noting relevant judgments.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 25TH BHADRA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 22732 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
BIJU ABRAHAM AGED 52 YEARS S/355801 A, HAV/ORL S/O LATE V.O.ABRAHAM, VADAKKELAYYATHU HOUSE, THIRUVANDOOR P.O.,ERAMALLIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 689124 BY ADVS. P.P.BIJU ARYA ASHOKAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI., PIN - 110001
2 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES, SHILLONG, MEGHALAYA., PIN - 793011 BY ADV ASG OF INDIA MANU.S
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 2nd respondent can be directed to consider the petitioner's representation for monetary benefits in the rank of Warrant Officer.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Biju Abraham
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Director General Assam Rifles
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court