Murikoli Manoj Kumar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC15 Jul 2022WP(C)/22008/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court set aside an order by the Land Revenue Commissioner that reversed a Sub Collector's grant of permission for land conversion, holding it violated a prior judgment. The Court directed the Respondent Panchayat to provisionally number the constructed building.

What did the court decide?

Ext.P12 order is set aside. Respondents in WP(C) No.10373 of 2022 directed to give a provisional number to the building constructed by the petitioner.

What the court decided

AI extract

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

¶3

FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 24TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 10373 OF 2022

¶4

PETITIONER/S:

¶5

EDACHOLI MANATT SHUBHANGHI,
AGED 61 YEARS
D/O. PARVATHY, MUKUND NIVAS, PONNIYAM WEST POST,
THALASSERY-670 641, KANNUR DISTRICT.

¶6

BY ADVS.
C.P.PEETHAMBARAN
P.T.SHEELA

¶7

RESPONDENT/S:

¶8

1 KADIRUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KADIRUR P.O, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670 642, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶9

2THE SECRETARY,
KADIRUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KADIRUR
P.O,THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670 642.
BY ADVS.
BINDUMOL JOSEPH
VINODKUMAR CHAMBALON

¶10

OTHER PRESENT:

¶11

SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GP

Murikoli Manoj Kumar Vs State of Kerala — Public Procurement and Tenders | Kerala HC (2022)

¶32

6ADDL. R6 RAGHAVAN.P.K,
AGED 67 YEARS
SHIBU NIVAS, 3RD MILE, PONNIYAM WEST P.O,
THALASSERY, KANNUR- 670641.
ADDITIONAL R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
15.07.2022 IN I.A. NO. 1/2019.
BY ADVS.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI.SHAKTHI PRAKASH
V.A.VINOD
SHRI.RAJESH KUMAR P.V.
SMT.M.V.ASHA BINDU

¶43

MURIKOLI MANOJ KUMAR
AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. ACHUTHAN, AGED 47 YEARS, AYURVEDA
THERAPIST,RESIDING AT DEVANANDANAM, P.O. TEMPLE
GATE,THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 102.
BY ADVS.
SMT.M.V.ASHA BINDU
SRI.SHAKTHI PRAKASH

¶54

8KEERTHI PRABHAKARAN
AGED 30 YEARS
W/O. N. VIJOY, AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT E.P.
37/434,VAISHNAVAM, ERANHOLI GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
PONNANI WEST P.O., THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT,
PIN - 670 641.
BY ADV SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN

¶136

`PETITIONER EXHIBIT` `EXHIBIT-P1`	`S` `TRUE COPY OF THE` `THE PROPERTY OF T`	`PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING` `HE 4TH RESPONDENT`
`EXHIBIT-P2`	`TRUE COPY ORF THE` `DATED 12/06/2014` `GRAMA PANCHAYATH`	`BUILDING PERMIT` `GRANTE BY KATHIRUR` `TO THE DAUGHTER`
`EXHIBIT-P3`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `CONSTRUCTED BY TH` `PETITIONER`	`RESIDENTIAL BUILDING` `E DAUGHTER OF THE`
`EXHIBIT-P4`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `08/08/2014 OF THE` `THE 3RD RESPONDEN`	`ORDER DATED` `2ND RESPONDENT TO`
`EXHIBIT-P5`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `FILED BY THE 2ND` `23715/2014`	`COUNTER AFFIDAVIT` `RESPONDENT IN W.P(C)`
`EXHIBIT-P6`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `18/08/2015 OF THE`	`ORDER DATED` `2ND RESPONDENT`
`EXHIBIT-P7`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `06/11/2015 IN W.P`	`JUDGMENT DATED` `(C) 26712/2015`
`EXHIBIT-P8`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `RESPONDENT DATED`	`ORDER OF THE 2ND` `26/12/2015`
`EXHIBIT-P9`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `22/02/2016 ISSUED` `GRAMA PANCHAYATH`	`BUILDING PERMIT DATED` `BY THE KATHIRUR` `TO THE PETITIONER`
`EXHIBIT-10`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `THE CONSTRUCTION`	`PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING` `OF PETITIONER'S HOUSE`
`EXHIBIT-P11`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `THE CONSTRUCTION` `PROPERTIES OF THE`	`PHTOGRAPHS SHOWING` `OF NEIGHBOURING` `PETITIONER`
`EXHIBIT-P12`	`TRUE COPY OF THE` `03/05/2017 OF THE`	`ORDER DATED` `IST RESPONDENT`
`RESPONDENT EXHIBIT`	`S`
`Exhibit R4(a)`	`TRUE COPY OF DOCU` `OF SRO KADIRUR.`	`MENT NO. 1333 OF 2013`

¶139

Exhibit R4(b)TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF THE
DATABANK PUBLISHED BY THE SECRETARY,
KADIRUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, UNDER THE
KERALA CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND AND
WETLAND ACT.
Exhibit R4(c)TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
21.06.2017 , FILED BY THE 4TH
RESPONDENT BEFORE THE LLMC AND OTHERS.

¶141

Exhibit P13TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
28.03.2016 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT AND
THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
DATED 25.4.2016.
Exhibit P14TRUE COPY OF THE INSPECTION NOTICE
DATED 9.6.2017 ISSUED BY BINNY M
ADVOCATE/COMMISSIONER IN O.S. NO.
33/2014 ON THE FILE OF MUNSIFF COURT,
THALASSERY.

¶144

Exhibit r4(d)COPY OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE ABOVE
MENTIONED BLOCKED CHANNEL, THE PLOT OF
KEERTHI AND BIJOY WHERE THEIR HOUSE IS
BEING CONSTRUCTED AND THE ABUTTING NEW
ROAD CREATED BY BLOCKING THE CHANNEL.
Exhibit R4(e)COPY OF RECEIPT ISSUED FROM KADIRUR
PANCHAYAT SHOWING THE ACCEPTANCE OF
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT FROM
THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

¶148

`PETITIO` `EXHIBIT`	`NER EXHI` `P1`	`BITS` `TRUE COPY OF` `OF SRO KADIRU`	`DOCUMENT NO. 1745 OF 2009` `R`
`EXHIBIT`	`P2`	`TRUE COPY OF` `OF SRO KADIRU`	`DOCUMENT NO. 1333 OF 2013` `R`
`EXHIBIT`	`P3`	`TRUE COPY OF` `OF SRO KADIRU`	`DOCUMENT NO. 2677 OF 2009` `R`
`EXHIBIT`	`P4`	`TRUE COPY OF` `DATABANK PUBL` `RESPONDENT UN` `CONSERVATION` `ACT.`	`RELEVANT PAGES OF THE` `ISHED BY THE 5TH` `DER THE KERALA` `OF PADDY LAND AND WETLAND`
`EXHIBIT`	`P5`	`TRUE COPY OF` `22.02.2016 OB` `RESPONDENT FR`	`BUILDING PERMIT DATED` `TAINED BY THE 6TH` `OM THE 5TH RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P6`	`TRUE COPY OF` `12.06.2014 OB` `RESPONDENT FR`	`BUILDING PERMIT DATED` `TAINED BY THE 7TH AND 8TH` `OM THE 5TH RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P7`	`TRUE COPY OF` `19.11.2014 FI` `HEREIN FILED` `2014 OF THIS`	`COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DATED` `LED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT` `IN W.P.(C) NO. 23715 OF` `HONOURABLE COURT.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P8`	`TRUE COPY OF` `IN W.P.(C) NO` `COURT OF KERA`	`JUDGMENT DATED 12.03.2015` `. 23715 OF 2014 OF HIGH` `LA.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P9`	`TRUE COPY OF` `IN W.P.(C) NO` `COURT OF KERA`	`JUDGMENT DATED 06.01.2015` `. 26712 OF 2015 OF HIGH` `LA.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P10`	`TRUE COPY OF` `ISSUED BY THE`	`ORDER DATED 26.12.2015` `2ND RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P11`	`TRUE COPY OF` `ISSUED BY THE` `COMMISSIONER.`	`ORDER DATED 03.05.2017` `LAND REVENUE`
`EXHIBIT`	`P12`	`TRUE COPY OF` `23.05.2017 IN` `2017 OF HIGH`	`INTERIM ORDER DATED` `W.P.(C) NO. 16863 OF` `COURT OF KERALA.`

¶151

`EXHIBIT`	`P13`	`TRUE COPY OF GAZETTE NOTIFICATION` `DATED 30.05.2017 ISSUED BY THE FIRST` `RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P14`	`TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED` `21.06.2017, FILED BY THE PETITIONER` `BEFORE THE LLMC AND OTHER AUTHORITIES` `CONCERNED.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P15`	`TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 21.06.2017` `ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P16`	`TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 21.06.2017` `ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT.`
`RESPOND`	`ENT EXHI`	`BITS`
`Exhibit`	`R6 a`	`TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS` `NO.33/2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND` `HIS WIFE BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT,` `THALASSERY.`
`Exhibit`	`R6 a`	`TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED` `BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH` `RESPONDENT WHICH IS OBTAINED UNDER` `RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.`
`Exhibit`	`R6 b`	`TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED` `BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH` `RESPONDENT WHICH IS OBTAINED UNDER` `RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.`
`Exhibit`	`R6 c`	`TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 4TH` `RESPONDENT DATED 28.03.2014.`
`Exhibit`	`R6 d`	`TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 4TH` `RESPONDENT DATED 28/03/2014 IN RESPECT` `OF THE PROPERTY OF 7TH RESPONDENT.`
`Exhibit`	`R6 e`	`TRUE PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING CONSTRUCTION` `OF 6TH RESPONDENT'S BUILDING.`
`Exhibit`	`R6 f`	`TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED` `28/03/2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER` `BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`
`Exhibit`	`R6 g`	`TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED` `25.04.20016 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`

¶155

`PETITIO`	`NER EXHIBIT`	`S`
`Exhibit`	`P1`	`TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED` `6.11.2015 IN W.P.C NO. 26712/2015 OF` `THIS HON'BLE COURT.`
`Exhibit`	`P2`	`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED` `26.12.2015 OF THE SUB COLLECTOR,` `THALASSERY.`
`Exhibit`	`P3`	`TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DATED` `22.2.2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST` `RESPONDENT.`
`Exhibit`	`P4`	`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 3.5.2017` `OF THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER,` `THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.`
`Exhibit`	`P5`	`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED` `23.05.2017 IN W.P.C NO. 16863/2017 OF` `THIS HON'BLE COURT.`
`Exhibit`	`P6`	`TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD` `DATED 18.8.2017 ISSUED BY THE 2ND` `RESPONDENT.`
`Exhibit`	`P7`	`TRUE PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE HOUSE OF` `THE PETITIONER.`
`Exhibit`	`P8`	`TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE INVITATION` `CARD OF THE PETITIONER'S SON KIRAN` `WITH POORNIMA SOLEMNIZED ON` `28.12.2017.`

Murikoli Manoj Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Snedar.S., Vs Chenkal Grama Panchayath

Abdul Salam N P Vs the State of Kerala

P.K.Muhammedali Vs the Amarambalam Grama Panchayath

Asokan Vs State of Kerala

Murikoli Manoj Kumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Snedar.S., Vs Chenkal Grama Panchayath

Abdul Salam N P Vs the State of Kerala

P.K.Muhammedali Vs the Amarambalam Grama Panchayath

Asokan Vs State of Kerala

A compact analysis

Coram

Edacholi Manatt Shubhanghi Vs the Land Revenue Commissioner