Susan Jacob v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 18676 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
SUSAN JACOB
AGED 55 YEARS
W/O JACOB,
THOMMANKUDIYIL HOUSE, MALAYIDAMTHURUTH KARA,
KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KERALA-PIN-683562.
BY ADVS.
SHIBU VARGHESE
BASIL JOY
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALAREPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.2 THE CHAIRMAN STATE ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY, KSRTC SHOPPING COMPLEX, THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN682030.3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, PIN682030.4 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MINI CIVIL STATION, MUVATTUPUZHA, VELLURKUNNAM P.O, PIN-686673.5 THE DIRECTOR MINING AND GEOLOGY, DIRECTORATE OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004.6 THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM-682030.7 THE SECRETARY KIZHAKKAMBALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KIZHAKKAMBALAM P.O, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN683562.8 STATION HOUSE OFFICER THADIYITTAPARAMBU POLICE STATION, THADIYITTAPARAMB, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,KERALA, PIN683105.WP(C). No. 18676 OF 2021
2
9GEORGE ANTONY
MANAGING DIRECTOR,
G.K. GRANITES, OORAKKAD, OORAKKAD KARA,
KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PIN-
683561.
BY ADV SHRI.ABRAHAM P.MEACHINKARA, SC,
KIZHAKKAMBALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 07.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C). No. 18676 OF 2021
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 7th day of November, 2022
It is submitted by Sri. Abraham P. Meachinkara, the learned standing counsel appearing for the 7th respondent that the quarry unit of the 9th respondent is not functioning and that the lease period
is over.
Recording the submission of the 7th respondent as aforesaid, the writ petition is closed.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, JUDGE
mtk
WP(C). No. 18676 OF 2021
4
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18676/2021
PETITIO |
NER EXHI |
BITS |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Exhibit |
P1 |
TRUE COPY OF THECERTIFICATE DATEDTHE 9TH RESPONDEN |
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE28.12.2015 ISSUED TOT FOR .K.GRANITES. |
Exhibit |
P2 |
TRUE COPY OF THE3RD RESPONDENT BY |
COMPLAINT MADE TO THETHE PETITIONER. |
Exhibit |
P3 |
TRUE COPY OF THE5TH RESPONDENT BY |
COMPLAINT MADE TO THETHE PETITIONER. |
Exhibit |
P4 |
TRUE COPY OF THE6TH RESPONDENT BY |
COMPLAINT MADE TO THETHE PETITIONER. |
Exhibit |
P5 |
TRUE COPY OF THE7TH RESPONDENT BY |
COMPLAINT MADE TO THETHE PETITIONER. |
Exhibit |
P6 |
TRUE COPY OF THECOMPLAINT MADE TOTHE PETITIONER. |
POSTAL RECEIPT FOR THETHE 3RD RESPONDENT BY |
Exhibit |
P7 |
TRUE COPY OF THECOMPLAINT MADE TOTHE PETITIONER. |
POSTAL RECEIPT FOR THETHE 5TH RESPONDENT BY |
Exhibit |
P8 |
TRUE COPY OF THECOMPLAINT MADE TOTHE PETITIONER. |
POSTAL RECEIPT FOR THETHE 6TH RESPONDENT BY |
Exhibit |
P9 |
TRUE COPY OF THECOMPLAINT MADE TOTHE PETITIONER. |
POSTAL RECEIPT FOR THETHE 7TH RESPONDENT BY |
Exhibit |
P10 |
TRUE COPY OF THE31970/2014 DATEDHONOURABLE HIGH C |
ORDER IN WP(C)04.05.2015. OF THEOURT OF KERALA. |
Exhibit |
P11 |
TRUE COPY OF THENO.17361/2015 DATHONOURABLE HIGH C |
ORDER IN WPCED 26.12.15 OF THEOURT OF KERALA. |
Susan Jacob
State of Kerala
The Chairman State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
The District Collector Ernakulam
The Revenue Divisional Officer Muvattupuzha
The Director Mining and Geology
Murali Purushothaman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court