On 01.11.2022, the petitioner filed a writ petition and withdrew the same on the same day. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 1145 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
SASIKUMAR K.K.
AGED 52 YEARS
AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.LATE KRISHNAN, KUZHIYATH HOUSE,
CHEENTHALAR.P.O., KATTADIKAVALA, IDUKKI-685502.
BY ADVS.
T.R.S.KUMAR
SRI.L.G.SURESH BABU
SMT.DEENA JOSEPH
SHRI.ABHILASH AUGUSTINE M.
SRI.K.RAJAN (MUHAMMA)
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE KERALA STATE BACKWARD CLASS,
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., (UNDERTAKING BY THE GOVT.
OF KERALA), DISTRICT OFFICE AT ALIYAKUNNEL BUILDING,
OPP. TO ANASWARA SILKS, COLONY.P.O., CHERUTHONI,
IDUKKI, REP. BY ITS MANAGER-685602.
2ALI.M.I.,
AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.LATE IMBICHI MUHAMMED, MUTTIKKAL
HOUSE, KATTAPPANA.P.O., KALLUKUNNU, IDUKKI-685508.
BY ADV SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SC, KSBCDC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 1145 OF 2020
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 1st day of November, 2022
Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/V.G ARUN JUDGE
SJ
WP(C) NO. 1145 OF 2020
3
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1145/2020
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE PERSONAL LEDGER LOAN
NO.060106881 DATED 26.5.2015.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 3.8.2018 ISSUED BY
THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF CHEQUE BEARING NO.031403 DATED
NIL.
Sasikumar K.K.
The Kerala State Backward Class Development Corporation Ltd.
Ali.M.I.
V.G. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court