Dismissed
Latha, v. D.a.Asokan
Kerala HCWP(C)/10786/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single-paragraph tight order held that prayer prohibiting judgment pronouncement in underlying suit became infructuous as judgment dated 13.03.2022 was already pronounced; dismissed writ petition as no fresh remedy available.
What did the court decide?
None
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
¶4
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 13TH SRAVANA, 1944
¶5
WP(C) NO. 10786 OF 2022
¶6
PETITIONER/S:
¶7
LATHA,
AGED 51 YEARS
D/O.SUMATHY, RESIDING AT PADINJARE KANNAMKULANGAA, WARD
NO.XI, HOUSE NO.180, EZHUPUNNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
EZHUPUNNA VILLAGE, CHERTHALA, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT,
ERAMALLOOR P.O., PIN-688 537.
BY ADV LIJOY P.VARGHESE
¶8
RESPONDENT/S:
¶9
D.A.ASOKAN,
S/O.ACHUTHAN, DEVASOMCHIRA, THEKKEVELIYIL, CMC 35 WARD,
VELORVATTOM, CHERTHALA, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-688 524.
¶10
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
¶11
WP(C) NO. 10786 OF 2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the prayer for prohibiting pronouncement of judgment in the underlying suit is permissible after judgment has been pronounced.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Latha
- respondent
D.A. Asokan
Coram
AI extract
V.G. Arun
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court