Disposed
Reena Chandra v. the Director
Kerala HCWP(C)/10759/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought correction of CIBIL adverse entry. Respondent bank informed court that entry was already corrected; writ petition was closed accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
¶4
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 30TH ASHADHA, 1944
¶5
WP(C) NO. 10759 OF 2021
¶6
PETITIONER:
¶7
REENA CHANDRA AGED 40 YEARS W/O. SANTHOSH ,RESIDING AT 'AVITTOM' PUTHEN NADA, THEKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM - DISTRICT 691 016. BY ADVS. C.R.JAYAKUMAR SRI.NOBEL RAJU
¶8
RESPONDENTS:
¶9
- 1 THE DIRECTOR, TRANS UNION CIBIL LIMITED, ONE INDIA BULLS CENTER, TOWER #2A, 19TH FLOOR, SENAPATI BAPT MARG, ELPHINSTONE ROAD, MUMBAI 400 013.
¶10
- 2 THE BRANCH MANAGER, MICROSATE BRANCH, INDIAN BANK TOWERS, MAIN ROAD, CHINNAKADA P.O. KOLLAM 691 001.
¶11
- 3 MRS. SINDHU RAJEEV, ADS CHAIRPERSON, M/S. SNEHA KUDUMBASREE UNIT, PUTHEN NADA, THEKKEVILA P.O. KOLLAM 691 016, RESIDING AT RAJEEVAM, PUTHEN NADA, THEKKEVILA P.O. KOLLAM 691 016.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
REENA CHANDRA
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR, TRANS UNION CIBIL LIMITED
- respondent
THE BRANCH MANAGER, MICROSATE BRANCH, INDIAN BANK
- respondent
MRS. SINDHU RAJEEV
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court