Thomas v. Mukundan
Case brief
What is this about?
A single day order dismissing a writ appeal directed to close the matter as the status quo direction became inoperative. The court directed service of the original order on the first respondent.
What did the court decide?
The writ appeal is closed. The competent authority is directed to serve a copy of the order passed on Ext.P6 application to the first respondent forthwith.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 12TH MAGHA, 1943
WA NO. 62 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 26012/2021 DATED 17.12.2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT/4TH RESPONDENT:
THOMAS
AGED 53 YEARS S/O. PAILY, PALACHUVADU HOUSE, PANNIKUZHY KARA, PUTHENCRUZE P. O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682308.
BY ADVS. SUNIL KUMAR A.G JOHN VIPIN
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 AND 5:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
THOMAS
- other
MUKUNDAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE TAHSILDAR KUNNATHUNADU
- respondent
THE VILLAGE OFFICER PUTHENCRUZE
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court