extension of approval for D.Pharm course in the 1st , 2nd and 3rd petitioner institutions, for the academic year 2020-21, was withheld for want of consent of affiliation from the 2nd respondent Examining Authority. In so far as the 4th petitioner institution is concerned, the approval for starting D.Pharm course for the academic year 2020-21 was withheld for want of consent of affiliation from the 2nd respondent Examining Authority. The 1st petitioner institution was granted Ext.P2 consent of affiliation by the 2nd respondent Examining Authority on 09.10.2020, which was never brought to the notice of the Executive Committee of the PCI, which met on 22.10.2020. In so far as the 2nd petitioner institution is concerned, Ext.P2(a) consent of affiliation of the 2nd respondent Examining Authority was obtained only on 03.11.2020. Since the 1st and 2nd petitioner institutions have already obtained consent of affiliation from the 2nd respondent Examining Authority, which were produced before the PCI along with Ext.P5 representation dated 04.11.2020, as Annexures A1 and A2, this Court is of the view that the request made by the said institutions for extension of affiliation for D.Pharm course, for the academic year 202021, requires reconsideration at the hands of the 1st respondent PCI. In so far as the 3rd petitioner institution is concerned, though approval was granted for D.Pharm course for the academic year 2019-20, they could not commence the course during that academic year, for want of consent of affiliation from the 2nd respondent Examining Authority. Even while making application for extension of approval for D.Pharm course for the academic year 2020-21, the 3rd petitioner could not secure consent of affiliation from the 2nd respondent Examining Authority. Till date, the 3rd petitioner has not obtained consent of affiliation from the 2nd respondent. Therefore, though the 3rd petitioner institution did not commence D.Pharm course during the academic year 2019-20, the application made by the said institution for continuation of approval for the academic year 2020-21 cannot be considered on the strength of the undertaking given to produce consent of affiliation of the 2nd respondent