Subadra v. Shaji
Case brief
What is this about?
This is an appeal challenging an order confirming a Maintenance Tribunal decision. The High Court dismissed the appeal regarding the liability to maintain but granted permission to enhance the monthly maintenance from Rs.2,000 to Rs.3,000 effective April 2022.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondent to pay Rs.3,000 per month as maintenance to the appellant, commencing from April 2022.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1943
WA NO. 346 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28473/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
SUBADRA
AGED 79 YEARS, D/O.PAPPI, RANDUPARAYIL,
KARUMADI VILLAGE, AMBALAPPUZHA TALUK,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT - 688 561.
BY ADVS.
K.VINAYA
RAVI KRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal challenging the maintenance tribunal order should be allowed.
Whether the maintenance amount ordered by authorities can be enhanced voluntarily by the respondent.
Whether there was any violation of conditions of transfer warranting reversal of confirmed Tribunal order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Subadra
- respondent
Shaji
- respondent
Revenue Divisional Officer and Tribunal for Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens, Alappuzha
- respondent
Appellate Tribunal for Welfare and Protection of Senior Citizen and District Magistrate, Alappuzha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court