State of Kerala v. Dr. E.C. Raveendran
Case brief
What is this about?
Appearing absent, the Court noted the manufacturing factory was closed in 2006 and the relevant excise duty statute has been repelled. The Court refused to examine the merits after a 16-year gap. The appeal was disposed of.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Appeal is disposed of without going into the merits due to the lapse of time and closure of the factory.