Dismissed
Princy v. Anoop
Kerala HCTr.P(C)/185/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed a lingering 2020 transfer petition for default as the petitioner failed to effect service of notice on the respondent despite a prior order in September 2022, assuming the petitioner lacks desire to prosecute.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
¶4
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 4TH ASWINA, 1944
¶5
TR.P(C) NO. 185 OF 2020
¶6
IN OP 350/2020 OF FAMILY COURT,TRIVANDRUM
¶7
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
¶8
PRINCY,
AGED 34 YEARS,
D/O. PRABHAKARAN,
RESIDING AT PRINCY BHAVAN,
PONGODU JUNCTION, VELIYAM P.O.
VELIYAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 540.
¶9
BY ADV V.A.AJIVAS
¶10
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
¶11
ANOOP,
AGED 39 YEARS,
S/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN, RESIDING AT ANUPAMA LIC LANE
KALLAMPALLY, MEDICAL COLLEGE,
MAVARTHALAKONATHU MURI, ULLOOR VILLAGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 011.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Princy
- respondent
Anoop
Coram
AI extract
C.S. Dias
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court