Nayana v. Vishnu P. Naick
Case brief
What is this about?
In a transfer petition filed by a wife to transfer a family court case between two districts, the court dismissed the petition as not pressed after counsel submitted that the marital dispute had been settled.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1944 TR.P.(C) NO.156 OF 2021
(SEEKING TRANSFER OF OP 2372/2020 OF FAMILY COURT, TRIVANDRUM TO FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA)
PETITIONER:
NAYANA, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O.SIVARAJ P., KOLADATH HOUSE, ERUVA P.O., KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 572.
BY ADV. RENJIT GEORGE
RESPONDENT:
VISHNU P. NAICK, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.T.R.PANDURANGA NAICK, PERMANENTLY RESIDING IN THAYYIL HOUSE, OLD THIRUMALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 011, NOW RESIDING IN T.C.17/1117, SONFIYAD, PANGOD, THIRUMALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 006. BY ADV. SHAJIN S.HAMEED
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
NAYANA
- respondent
VISHNU P. NAICK
Coram
BASANT BALAJI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court