In a regular second appeal, the High Court of Kerala disposed of the matter based on a mediation compromise between the parties. The court ordered the refund of court fees and recorded the agreement as part of the judgment.
Refund of the entire court fee to the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH couRT oF KERALA AT ERMAKuun
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY, THE 7" DAY 0F JANUARY 2®22 / 17TH POUSHA, 1943
BSA MO. 273 0F 2®Q£
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 3®.08.2005 IN AS 95/2®03 0F SUB
COURT, RATTAPPANA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29/08/2®03 IW 0S 80/200® OF
MUNSIFF COURT, IDUKKI
AIPELLAMT/APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANTi
SELVARAJ, S/0.CHELLAYYAN, PUTHEN VEEDU, URUMPELLU RARA, ,
KOTTAMALAI P.0. , IDUKKI VILLAGE.
BY ADVS.
CRASHIOLIS KURIAKOSE (SR. )
K . C . SANTHOSHKUMAR
GEORGE MATHEWS, PRANOY K. KOTTARAM
RESPO¥:E"T'R5£E:¥iE#L:f=#;8=EEE:LfwDE=F:W3£¥=S DfvE3|5= , KOTTAMALAI
ESTATE LINES, KOTTAMALA RARA, VAGAMON VILLAGE. (DIED)
(RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 AND Tl+E APPELLANT ARE RECORDED AS THE LEGAL HEIRS 0F THE DECEASED IST RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 25.11.2019 IN HJC.NO.312/2®19.)
2 CHELLAMMA, W/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, IIIm DIVISION, KOTTAMALAI ESTATE LINES, KOTTAMALA RARA, VAGAMON VILLAGE.
4 PECHIYAMMA, W/0.THOLLAMUTHU, IIIro DIVISION, KOTTAMALA ESTATE LINES, KOTTAMALA RARA, VAGAMON VILLAGE.
URUPELLU RARA, KOTTAMALAI P.0. , IDUKKI VILLAGE.
|||RD DovISI0N, KOTTAMALAI ESTATE LINES, KOTTAMALA IIARA, VAGAMON VILLAGE. (DELETED)
R6 IS DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AT THE RISK 0F THE APPELLANT AS PER ORDER DATED 15.12.2©21 IN IA.2/2©21 IN RSA . 273/2006
BY ADV. GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW -R2
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS 0N
®7.01.2®22, THE COURT 011 THE SAME DAY DELIVERED Tl]E FOLLOWING:
RSA NO. 273 0F 2006
JUDGMENT
The matter is settl.ed in mediation. Hence, the appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise arrived at by the parties. The compromise will form part of the judgment and decree. Refund the entire court fee under Section 69A of the Keral.a Court Fees and Suits Vat.uation Act to the
appellant .
Sd/-
P . SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
msp
08217d
.iH E]
No.D: j799/2021
Sub Court, Kattappana, Dated:ZZ.12.2021 Phone No. 04868 272501 E-mail: [email protected]
From
Varun K.S., Co-ordinator (S ub Judge), Mediation Sub Centre, Kattappana.
E:l,, DJEL
To
The Registrar (Judicial), Hon'ble High Court of Kerala, Eranakulam.
Sir'
Sub.. - Mediation Report in R.S.A. 273/2006 Of the Hon'ble High Court Of Kerala (in A.S. 95/2003 Of Sub Court, Kattappana in O.S. 80/2000 Of Munsiff Court, Idukki -Suli)mitting Of -Reg:-
Rof :-High Court Order dated 15.12.2021 in R.S.A. 273/2006(G) Of the Hon'ble High Court Of Kerala.
rl
With reference to the above, I am submitting herewith the Mediation Report in R.S.A. 273/2006 of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala (in A.S. 95/2003 of Sub Court, Kattappana in O.S. 80/2000 of Munsiff Court, Idukki), for favour of necessary action.
CO-ORD MEDIATION SUB CENTRE, KATTAPPANA.
Mps.
MEDIATION SUB CENTRE KATTAPPANA
INFORMATION REGARDING THE MEDIATION OF THE CASE REFERRED FROM COURT
REPORT 0F THE MEDIATOR
s.A at3|c2oo6 2) Nameofthe court : Ht'aR C®VIVAe#rmk&ffi#~ q# r\ 3) Mediation reference No •. MR. a65|'a| € 4) Dates fixed for mediation a,I,alana, 5) Name of Mediator .. Agiv Bavir.tr gosrf u €&fflul' 6) Result of mediation if any NAME AND SIGNATURE OF MEDIATOR Mtw8 efu~rm JOsepr Place: Kattappana Date:...a.,.. ..20rs alMEDiATioN SUB CENTRE, KATrAppANA
BEFORE THE HONOuRABLE .#j#.R..q9.vyr€.#.ketral6LGut eanri6&kultryv7
AP#RE3REis+ CH::a;A;£rf u##ac#5G p€:%urtrv~aninNI:
MEMORANDOMorAGREEMEN"#DER¥Ec¥i`OkkoFTHEcODEOFciviL6pR§cffi+ifc*@rty). READwiTiiRULE24OFi.HEciviLpROcEDURE'ALTERNATivFL>ispuTE.sREsOLurioN]RULEs2Oo8 *
The parties abov.e named beg to submit as follows:
a
®
I.Suit/Petition(s),Appeal(s),Complaintwerereferredtomediationforresolving thedisputcibetweentheparties.Inthecourseofmedidtjon,theyresolved theirdisputeandhaveagreedtothefollowingtermsandccinditions:-..2 €ca#wh€##%ulee:#aM_ndnd
-EE-
3=Qno8E£#?th3:#@hen##FalQ'%%6unqon u f ty of )ihw7Jygr)9rch rql^lrac lASL/.af a?;/:^• --^ _ _ -I ^ . p-s-A. 2:1 08 -i ro Mrdh gfaprbrbG?cf tylfro rd24Vhf)9o®QJ#@8c9ap^'¥_ G7 ® 2J) en,j FIEN dyidscdio±rmqischp_wlpf3Hfo/_=A #ast#_£^,dy=F=#,rty%FrfeaeormL,%fo£#*4€ndan#mes7l=":urdf roil;rfe 'kbal d3^T7^®rfu%n T^#4fh I _ ^n __A,`14 a Uri£*,roueirtri#al€;rdifeQ4L7Dmng£#n%z&#;%=;isrfe:%p±e?ifeA3qth di?QZ±fi8##?fy:
4mfsofe3ifeQ#^#:.i-
®
-3.-
;i ,t'(:)/:::,t,:Le(:), ;;p:::(rse)S::ddeac8g/: rstpo:::e::din [tnetr°msb:fTheee:fot::a ,:aa:::Se'm:::'es Pray that the
The parties will appear on ........................... before the Honourable Court for passing orders /Decree in terms of the above said agreement.
Plaintiff(s)/Petitionerfs)/AppeNrfe)/Appncant(s)/c`-,mplainant Defendant(s)/Respo<:nt(s)/Accused
r\
cD~vrdsnJde7th. a-SezEL
Advocate for
Advocate fo r
plaintiff(s)/Petitionerts)/AppeMrfe;/AppNcant(s)/complalnant Defendant(s)/Respoffi:nt(s)/Accused
VERIFICATION
We , the parties above named, do hereby solemnly state and declare that what is contalned in paragraphs 1 to ....... „ are true to the bes of our knowledge, information and belief.
®
•r:-:,r{:..:_=3
t®algfraiulGftyi±apD
p la i ntiff(s)/Petitio ne r(s)/Ap p8falnt(s)/Applica nt(s)/Compla i na nt D efe nda nt(s)/Re sp5o5rfle nt(s)/Accuse d
Place -Kattappana
Date....£J. ...2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be disposed of given that the dispute was resolved through mediation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SELVARAJ
CHELLAMMA
MALLIKA
PECHIYAMMA
KURUVAMMA
P. SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court