Sasikala (Died) v. Remesan
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Second Appeal filed against a decree fell away due to death of the first appellant and the second appellant's expressed lack of interest, resulting in the withdrawal of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed; pending applications closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 4TH BHADRA, 1944
RSA NO. 1009 OF 2017
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN A.S.NO.68/2013 DATED 31.01.2017 OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.117/2011 DATED 29.07.2013 OF THE MUNSIFFMAGISTRATE COURT, SOUTH PARAVUR.
APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT/1ST PLAINTIFF:
1 SASIKALA (DIED) ASHANTAZHIKATHU VEEDU, MEENADU VILLAGE, NEDUNGOLAM P.O., KOLLAM.
2 KRISHNA,
AGED 18 YEARS, ASHANTAZHIKATHU VEEDU, MEENADU VILLAGE,NEDUNGOLAM P.O., KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.SREEKANTH S.NAIR
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Krishna
- respondent
Remeshan
- respondent
Leela Kumari
- respondent
Saji
- respondent
Bhasurangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court