Ramla v. Khadeeja
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a review petition when the learned counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the review.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1944
RP NO. 668 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP(C) 2542/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
RAMLA,AGED 48 YEARS,W/O V.K MUHAMMED, AGED 48 YEARS, VADAKKEPUTHANPURA HOUSE, CHERUVATTO POST, KAKSHAIPPADY, IRAMALLOOR VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK, PIN - 686691 BY ADV P.M.RAFEEK
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS
- 1 KHADEEJA,W/O LATE MAKKAR, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, PAROLIL HOUSE, RANDARKARA KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, PIN - 686673
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAMLA
- respondent
KHADEEJA
- respondent
SULAIHA MAKKAR
- respondent
SUHARA KOYAN
- respondent
FATHIMA @ KUNJATHU
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court