A. Nilarudeen v. S. Rasia
Case brief
What is this about?
Court allowed the review petition upon learning that the appellant had not pressed the appeal. The appeal was restored to file and the stay was revived and extended for one month.
What did the court decide?
Review petition allowed; appeal restored to file; stay revived and extended for one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 28TH ASWINA, 1944
RP NO. 466 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN Mat.Appeal 380/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER:
A. NILARUDEEN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O ABDUL RASHEED, ROAD VILLA VEEDU, NAZEER MANZIL, MADANTHAPACHA, PUTHUSSERIMUKKU P.O
KALLAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 605, PIN – 695 605
BY ADVS. S.SHANAVAS KHAN S.INDU
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the review petition and restore the maternity appeal to file.
Whether to revive and extend the stay granted in the matter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. NILARUDEEN
- respondent
S. RASIA
Coram
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court