Rajalakshmi v. Kavitha
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court held that the appeal was instituted prior to the amendment and must be transferred to the District Court based on property valuation. The Registrar was directed to return the memoranda for resubmission.
What did the court decide?
Registry directed to return appeal memorandum for resubmission before District Court, Palakkad.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 13TH ASHADHA, 1944
RFA NO. 132 OF 2019 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2018 IN OS NO.328/2012
OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF IN O.S.:
1 RAJALAKSHMI AGED 57 YEARS D/O.KUTTAPPAN AND W/O.UNNIKRISHNAN, NADUVIL VEEDU, THOTTAKKARA, THENARI PO, ELAPPULLY VILLAGE, PALAKKAD TALUK AND DISTRICT-678622.
BY ADVS. P.B.KRISHNAN P.M.NEELAKANDAN P.B.SUBRAMANYAN SABU GEORGE MANU VYASAN PETER
RESPONDENTS/SUPPL.DEFENDANTS 2 TO 5 IN O.S.:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a regular first appeal instituted prior to the amendment lies before the High Court or the District Court based on court fee valuation versus property valuation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajalakshmi
- respondent
Kavitha
- respondent
Sangeetha
- respondent
Keerthana
- respondent
Subhadra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court