Aji Begum v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 46 OF 2017
TA 359/2014 OF AGRL.INCOME TAX ADDITIONAL BENCH,KOTTAYAM REVISION PETITIONER/S:
B KOCHUMON AGED 47 YEARS 47 YEARS, S/O. SRI SHAMSUDEEN, PUTHUVEL VEEDU, CHIRAKKADAVAM, KAYAMKULAM 690 502
BY ADVS. SRI.ASWIN GOPAKUMAR SRI.ANWIN GOPAKUMAR SRI.K.AMAL NATH NAIK SRI.ARJUN RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/S:
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TAXES DEPARTMENT,GOVT. SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV MAHESH CHANDRAN SR. GP.V.K. SHAMSUDHEEN
THIS OTHER TAX REVISION (VAT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.11.2022 ALONG WITH OTR(VAT) NO.31/2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OT.REV NO. 46 OF 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1944
OT.REV NO. 31 OF 2017
TA(VAT)NO.359/2014 OF AGRL.INCOME TAX ADDITIONAL
BENCH,KOTTAYAM
REVISION PETITIONER/S:
AJI BEGUM AGED 39 YEARS W/O.SRI.KOCHUMON, PUTHUVEL VEEDU, CHIRAKKADAVAM, KAYAMKULAM-690502
BY ADVS. SRI.ASWIN GOPAKUMAR SRI.ANWIN GOPAKUMAR SRI.K.AMAL NATH NAIK SRI.ARJUN RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/S:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
THIS OTHER TAX REVISION (VAT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.11.2022 ALONG WITH OTR(VAT) NO.46/2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OT.REV NO. 46 OF 2017
-3-
S.V.BHATTI
& BASANT BALAJI, JJ.
OT.REV NOS. 46 and 31 OF 2017
ORDER
(Dated this the 7th day of November 2022)
S.V.Bhatti J.,
Adv.Mahesh Chandran, on instructions informs
that the prayer in the case is rendered as ineffective. The submission is placed on record.
The Revision Petitions are dismissed as
infrcutuous accordingly.
sd
S.V.BHATTI, JUDGE
sd
BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE
dl/
B KOCHUMON
AJI BEGUM
STATE OF KERALA
S.V. BHATTI
BASANT BALAJI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court